Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454121›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

Viewing Time Behavior in a Diverse Sample of 320 Pedohebephilic and Teleiophilic Men Who Have Committed Child Sexual Offense and Who Have Not.

Charlotte Hoffmann, Christopher Sinke, Till Amelung, Klaus M Beier, Henrik Walter, Inka Ristow, Martin Walter, Kolja Schiltz, Boris Schiffer, Jonas Kneer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charlotte Hoffmann *Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Clinical Psychology and Sexual Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-7806-7966
Christopher Sinke *Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Clinical Psychology and Sexual Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Till AmelungInstitute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus M BeierInstitute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Henrik WalterDepartment of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscences CCM, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Inka RistowDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin WalterGerman Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Berlin-Potsdam, Site Jena Magdeburg Halle, Magdeburg, Germany.
Kolja SchiltzDepartment of Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Boris SchifferDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, LWL-University Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
Jonas Kneer *Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Clinical Psychology and Sexual Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Tillmann H C Krueger *Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Clinical Psychology and Sexual Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Krueger.tillmann@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KR1205Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 1034/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With this study, we explored the complex interplay between sexual preference, behavior, and viewing time (VT) as an assessment tool for pedohebephilic interest by using a 2 × 2 factorial design. The design included two factors: sexual preference (pedohebephilic vs. teleiophilic) and history of child sexual abuse (with vs. without a prior child sexual offense [CSO]). A total of 320 men participated, including individuals with a sexual preference for children (n = 151) and those with a preference for adults (n = 169), encompassing those who had committed a CSO (n = 102) and those who had not (n = 218). By crossing these factors, the study investigated how preference and offense history interact to influence VT. Both ipsatized and raw VT data were analyzed. The clinical diagnosis of pedohebephilia and a prior CSO showed a significant association with the VT index. The study also revealed methodological insights, with raw VT data showing a primary effect of pedohebephilia and of CSO not visible in the ipsatized data. In a subsample of men with pedohebephilia, those who had not committed CSOs had longer absolute and relative VTs. In a subsample of men with teleiophilia, those who had committed CSO showed lower absolute and relative VTs for adults compared to healthy controls. They also showed higher relative VTs for Tanner stages 2-3. This study deepened our understanding of the complex interplay between sexual preference, behavior, and assessment methodologies, suggesting pathways for developing targeted interventions and preventive strategies for CSOs.

Indexed as

Child Abuse, SexualPedophiliaSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultChildHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsYoung AdultChild sexual offenseDSM-5IncarcerationPedohebephiliaViewing timeViewing Time Index

Identifiers

PMID41454121
PMCPMC12917018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.