ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning models based wear performance prediction of AZ31/TiC composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning prediction and hybrid GRA-AHP optimization of AWJM parameters of ultrasonic assisted stir cast Al6061-B[Formula: see text]C-ZrO[Formula: see text] composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic Ensemble Learning with Transfer Learning for Fatigue Performance Prediction in Ni-Based Superalloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the fabrication of AZ31 magnesium matrix composites reinforced with 5, 10 and 15 vol% TiC particles using the Friction Stir Processing (FSP) technique and evaluates their wear behavior under varying loads (10-50 N) and sliding speeds (75-225 mm/s). The incorporation of TiC significantly enhanced the microstructural and mechanical properties of the composites. In particular, the AZ31/15 vol% TiC composite exhibited a refined grain structure with an average grain size of ~ 8 μm, compared to ~ 60 μm in the unreinforced AZ31 alloy. The same composite also demonstrated a substantial increase in hardness from 62 HV (base alloy) to 116 HV, highlighting the effectiveness of TiC reinforcement in improving strength. A key innovation of this work is the application of five machine learning (ML) algorithms, trained on experimental data using input features such as load, sliding speed and reinforcement content, to model and predict wear performance. After rigorous hyperparameter optimization, the Gradient boost algorithm achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R² = 0.9987), with errors falling within the range of experimental uncertainty. The study further includes residual analysis and computational efficiency assessment, supporting interpretable and robust AI-driven modeling. This integrated experimental-ML approach establishes a new benchmark for predictive modeling and data-driven material design in magnesium-based metal matrix composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.