ArticleScientific reports2025
Wavelet-convolutional neural network for fault prediction in coal mine seismic data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seismic fault identification remains critical for resource exploration and geohazard prevention, yet conventional methods suffer from subjective interpretation bias and computational inefficiency. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) enhance automation, their neglect of multiscale frequency features limits accuracy. Here, propose a novel Wavelet-Convolutional Neural Network (W-CNN) and its variants (W-CNN R1, W-CNN R2 and W-CNN R3) that architecturally fuses discrete wavelet transforms (DWT) with CNNs, establishing a spatial-frequency learning paradigm. By embedding Haar wavelet filter banks with cross-scale residual connections, W-CNN achieves explicit decoupling of high-frequency fault details from low-frequency structural contexts, reducing parameters by 21% versus conventional CNNs. Evaluated on coal mine datasets, W-CNN R3 achieves 90.0% accuracy (F1-score 90.3%), surpassing mainstream CNNs (LeNet-5, AlexNet, VGG16) by 0.6-12.3%, with the highest recall (95.5%) and faster convergence. The model successfully resolves 30 out of 32 exposed complex micro-faults (93.8% detection rate), demonstrating strong consistency with roadway-exposed faults in geologically complex zones, which significantly enhances its predictive capability for small-scale discontinuities. The frequency selection mechanism effectively suppresses noise interference, while the optimized architecture enables orders-of-magnitude acceleration in 3D processing. This framework provides an extensible solution for intelligent geological interpretation, with critical applications in mine safety monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.