ArticleScientific reports2025
Early prediction of alopecia areata using machine learning modeling of neuro stress immune signatures from multi datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Hair Disorders: A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for carotid plaque in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is an easy-recurring disease that presents huge challenges globally. An efficient clinical tool to predict AA onset would be valuable for timely intervention. We extracted six AA-related datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). GO, KEGG, GSEA, GSVA and CIBERSORT algorithm were performed to elucidate the characteristics of AA. Feature genes were identified using LASSO regression and Random Forest algorithms. Five machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, K-nearest neighbors, Elastic Net, XGBoost and LightGBM) were employed to construct predictive models, with internal and external validation conducted to determine the optimal model. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to interpret the best-performing model and shiny framework was applied to establish an online predictive website. Five datasets (GSE45512, GSE68801, GSE80342, GSE58573, GSE74761) were integrated as train set and GSE148346 was defined as test set. Tissue regeneration and immune dysregulation were the key factors in AA pathogenesis. Three feature genes (KRT83, PPP1R1C, PIRT) were selected for model construction, with innate immune response, neural inflammatory and stress being a potential regulator for AA. The XGBoost model outperformed other algorithms, SHAP provided explanations for predictions and an online predictive website was established. Our study provides a potential "neuro-stress-immune" interplay insight into the pathogenesis of AA and establishes a clinically applicable predictive model for AA onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.