ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Ocular adverse effects of bisphosphonates and association with osteonecrosis from a real-world database.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWhile bisphosphonates are widely used to treat osteoporosis, ocular adverse effects (OAEs) and their associations with serious systemic side effects, such as osteonecrosis, remain unexplored in large, diverse cohorts.
methodRetrospective cohort study from a deidentified aggregated multinational electronic health records database. Patients were included based on no prior recorded history of OAEs, recorded prescription of bisphosphonates and a subsequent visit. The risk of osteonecrosis for patients with and without OAEs after bisphosphonate initiation was assessed. Propensity score matching was used to control for demographic factors and prior autoimmune conditions. Rates of OAEs were compared between patients on intravenous or oral bisphosphonates.
resultsA cohort of 944,559 patients was identified. The cohort mean age was 75 years. The most common OAEs were dry eyes (1.73%), cornea and ocular surface inflammation (0.97%), and uveitis (0.17%). Patients with any OAEs with bisphosphonate use compared to those without OAEs had an increased risk of osteonecrosis (RR: 1.48, (1.30, 1.93)), with the highest increased risk for zoledronate (RR: 2.22, (1.63-3.03)). Furthermore, intravenous bisphosphonates compared to oral bisphosphonates had an increased risk of dry eyes (RR: 1.27 (1.20, 1.36)) at all timepoints.
conclusionsAlthough rarer than reported in literature, our large cohort size revealed that patients on bisphosphonates with OAEs had an increased risk of osteonecrosis compared to those without OAEs. Patients on intravenous compared to oral bisphosphonates were at increased risk for OAEs. These findings guide ophthalmologists to identify OAEs from bisphosphonate use and to be vigilant for increased risks of systemic side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.