Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Structural inequalities and dietary diversity in Odisha: evidence from NSSO 68

Mayadhar Sethy, Sandhya R Mahapatro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mayadhar SethyNabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies, Bhubaneswar, India. mayadharsethyms@gmail.com.
Sandhya R MahapatroNabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study attempts to measure the caste-based dietary gap and relative contribution of different socioeconomic factors in Odisha, India, through the lens of the Capability Approach. We used National Sample Survey 68th (2011-12) and 79th (2022-23) rounds data that includes 13,113 sample. Dietary diversity was assessed using a 13-food group score, categorized into low, medium, and high based on established FAO/FANTA thresholds. The caste gap in dietary disparities is assessed using Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition for non-linear models. The decomposition analysis reveals the magnitude of caste-based dietary gap and the contribution of observed and unobserved factors to such gap. A gradual improvement in dietary diversity from low to medium category has been observed among SC/ST between 2011 and 12 and 2022-23 in Odisha. The marginal effects show socioeconomic status, household composition, cooking fuel &location are the increases the probability of being in the medium and higher dietary diversity. About 76% and 57% of caste-based inequalities in high and medium dietary diversity (with reference to low dietary diversity) explained by observable differences in endowments. While education and wealth (endowment component) are the key drivers of dietary diversity, the large unexplained component for shift from low to medium dietary status underscores the structural barriers such as social exclusion, cultural norms and differential market access that reinforces caste inequalities. Addressing the caste-based dietary gap therefore requires equity-focused, multidimensional nutrition strategies that combine economic development with targeted interventions.

Indexed as

DietAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultCapability approachCasteDecompositionDietary diversityOdisha

Identifiers

PMID41454041
PMCPMC12827951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.