Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Monitoring of ultra-high performance concrete manufacturing for reproducible quality and waste reduction.

Farzad Rezazadeh, Amin Abrishambaf, Gregor Zimmermann, Andreas Kroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farzad RezazadehDepartment of Measurement and Control Engineering, University of Kassel, Kassel, 34125, Germany. farzad.rezazadeh@mrt.uni-kassel.de.
Amin AbrishambafQuantumFusion GmbH, Waldeck, 34513, Germany.
Gregor ZimmermannMAITERIA UG, Kassel, 34131, Germany.
Andreas KrollDepartment of Measurement and Control Engineering, University of Kassel, Kassel, 34125, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) combines exceptional strength and durability, yet its industrial production is hampered by batch-to-batch variability that generates costly off-specification waste. Leveraging a 150-batch design-of-experiments dataset based on systematic variations of a single reference UHPC mix, this study takes a holistic view of the UHPC manufacturing chain and quantifies how fluctuations in raw material quality, storage conditions, dosing errors, mixer energy demand, and curing regimes affect the 28-day compressive strength. Ten diverse machine learning algorithms are benchmarked; the best-performing model explains ≥ 75 % of the strength variance with a prediction error ≤ 10 % under leave-one-out cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations reveal that long-term curing temperature and humidity dominate strength development, followed by ingredient moisture and silica fume impurity. These insights are operationalized in an at-line, operator-in-the-loop recommendation system that explores the curing envelope and proposes end-of-mix, batch-specific adjustments before curing starts. In five validation cases, curing adjustments rescued 5/5 underperforming batches, eliminating 75 L of off-specification UHPC and-considering cement only with 600 kg/[Formula: see text] and 15 L per batch of UHPC made with white Portland cement-avoided ≈ 41 kg CO

Indexed as

Compressive strengthData-driven modelingQuality reproducibilityRecommendation systemUltra-high performance concreteWaste minimization

Identifiers

PMID41454039
PMCPMC12748697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.