ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Clinically informed semi-supervised learning improves disease annotation and equity from electronic health records: a glaucoma case study.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Extraction of Postoperative Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis From Computed Tomography (CT) Reports: Semisupervised Deep Learning Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Sparse-Observation Multi-Horizon Glaucoma Progression Forecasting with Biologically Constrained Temporal Consistency: A Glaucoma Case Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Language-Model Reasoning Enables Automated Labeling of Lung Cancer Recurrence from Unstructured Clinical Records.Research square · 2026Article
- Rethinking scale in ophthalmic artificial intelligence: from bigger models to smarter clinical reasoning.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical notes represent a vast but underutilized source of information for disease characterization, whereas structured electronic health record (EHR) data such as ICD codes are often noisy, incomplete, and too coarse to capture clinical complexity. These limitations constrain the accuracy of datasets used to investigate disease pathogenesis and progression and to develop robust artificial intelligence (AI) systems. To address this challenge, we introduce Ci-SSGAN (Clinically Informed Semi-Supervised Generative Adversarial Network), a novel framework that leverages large-scale unlabeled clinical text to reannotate patient conditions with improved accuracy and equity. As a case study, we applied Ci-SSGAN to glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness characterized by pronounced racial and ethnic disparities. Trained on a demographically balanced subset of 349587 unlabeled ophthalmology notes and 2954 expert-annotated notes (drawn from an institutional corpus of 2.1 million notes), Ci-SSGAN achieved 0.85 accuracy and 0.95 AUROC, representing a 10.19% AUROC improvement compared to ICD-based labels (0.74 accuracy, 0.85 AUROC). Ci-SSGAN also narrowed subgroup performance gaps, with F1 gains for Black patients (+ 0.05), women (+ 0.06), and younger patients (+ 0.033). By integrating semi-supervised learning and demographic conditioning, Ci-SSGAN minimizes reliance on expert annotations, making AI development more accessible to resource-constrained healthcare systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.