Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41454019›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A case study of the application of AI to early stage drug discovery.

Abbi Abdel-Rehim, Larisa N Soldatova, Ross D King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abbi Abdel-RehimDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. aar52@cam.ac.uk.
Larisa N SoldatovaDepartment of Computing, University of London, London, UK.
Ross D KingDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/X032418/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in drug discovery, offering the potential to expedite the design of novel therapeutics. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a general-purpose conversational AI, ChatGPT (GPT-4o), in performing three distinct drug discovery tasks, assessing its ability to assist in early-stage molecular ideation and design. In the first task, ChatGPT generated molecules starting from five low-affinity EGFR inhibitors (IC₅₀ values of 10–3.16 µM), which were iteratively optimized in a QSAR model to produce compounds with predicted IC₅₀ values of ~ 10–50 nM. In the second task, de novo design of EGFR inhibitors produced a molecule with a predicted IC₅₀ of 94 nM in a single attempt. In the third task, ChatGPT generated non-covalent MCL1 inhibitors, with a top candidate achieving a docking score corresponding to a 39 nM dissociation constant. Because AI-generated molecules often face synthetic feasibility challenges, we also identified readily available analogues from a chemical vendor. These analogues were evaluated using molecular docking (AutoDock Vina) and QSAR models, with several achieving a promising activity range of 10–100 nM across the three tasks. These results demonstrate that general-purpose AI models like ChatGPT can accelerate early-stage drug discovery by assisting in molecular ideation and candidate prioritization.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryErbB ReceptorsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMolecular Docking SimulationQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID41454019
PMCPMC12827298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.