ArticleScientific reports2025
A case study of the application of AI to early stage drug discovery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in drug discovery, offering the potential to expedite the design of novel therapeutics. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a general-purpose conversational AI, ChatGPT (GPT-4o), in performing three distinct drug discovery tasks, assessing its ability to assist in early-stage molecular ideation and design. In the first task, ChatGPT generated molecules starting from five low-affinity EGFR inhibitors (IC₅₀ values of 10–3.16 µM), which were iteratively optimized in a QSAR model to produce compounds with predicted IC₅₀ values of ~ 10–50 nM. In the second task, de novo design of EGFR inhibitors produced a molecule with a predicted IC₅₀ of 94 nM in a single attempt. In the third task, ChatGPT generated non-covalent MCL1 inhibitors, with a top candidate achieving a docking score corresponding to a 39 nM dissociation constant. Because AI-generated molecules often face synthetic feasibility challenges, we also identified readily available analogues from a chemical vendor. These analogues were evaluated using molecular docking (AutoDock Vina) and QSAR models, with several achieving a promising activity range of 10–100 nM across the three tasks. These results demonstrate that general-purpose AI models like ChatGPT can accelerate early-stage drug discovery by assisting in molecular ideation and candidate prioritization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.