ArticleScientific reports2025
An improved steel defect detection model using multi-scale feature fusion based on YOLO-MFD.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CCP-YOLO: An Improved YOLOv11n Algorithm for Steel Surface Defect Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research on a lightweight model for laser-cut diamond defect detection based on multi-module collaborative optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenges of limited detection accuracy for small targets in complex backgrounds and the difficulty in model deployment due to a large number of parameters in steel surface defect detection, this paper proposes a lightweight detection model named YOLO-MFD, based on YOLO11n. First, to tackle the issue of missed detection caused by blurry defect images and indistinct edge features, a Multi-scale Edge Feature Enhancement (MEFE) module is designed, which enhances the discrimination capability for subtle defects by integrating multi-scale edge feature differences. Subsequently, in the feature fusion stage, a Global-to-Local Spatial Attention Bidirectional Feature Pyramid Network (GLSA-BiFPN) is constructed, which simplifies the feature propagation path while improving the fusion efficacy of cross-scale semantic information. Finally, a Group detection head (Ghead) is adopted to replace the original detection structure, significantly reducing the number of parameters through the introduction of grouped convolution while maintaining accuracy. Experimental results on the NEU-DET dataset demonstrate that YOLO-MFD achieves an mAP of 83.8%, representing a 5.9% improvement over YOLO11n, while reducing the number of parameters by 27% and computational cost by 6.3%. The results indicate that the proposed model effectively balances detection accuracy and lightweight design, making it suitable for real-time steel surface defect detection in complex industrial scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.