ArticleScientific reports2025
Mapping the technological evolution of generative AI: a patent network analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural characteristics and evolutionary trajectories of knowledge recombination in the field of AI-driven drug discovery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically maps the technological evolution and innovation landscape of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) through a large-scale analysis of patent networks. Leveraging advanced text mining, network modeling, and community detection techniques on over 20,000 patents from Lens.org, we identify key technological domains, trace conceptual shifts, and highlight emerging trends across three major periods (pre-2016, 2016-2020, 2021-2025). Results reveal a pivotal transition post-2016 from early modular and domain-specific innovations, such as neuromorphic computing and bioengineering, toward integrated generative frameworks, API-driven platforms, and multi-modal capabilities. The post-2016 era is characterized by rapid growth in patent volume, increased conceptual diversity, and diminishing modularity, reflecting the convergence of previously distinct subfields. Key emergent clusters include generative AI frameworks, advanced medical imaging, personalized interactive systems, media authentication, and privacy-preserving AI. Notably, growing attention to content authenticity and user personalization underscores the interplay between technological maturation and societal concerns. Comparative analysis with baseline and alternative clustering models demonstrates the robustness and interpretability of the chosen network approach. While limited by reliance on English-language patents and TF-IDF extraction, this work provides an actionable roadmap for R&D leaders, policymakers, and investors to navigate the dynamic GAI landscape and informs future research directions involving multilingual and semantic-rich analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.