Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41453986›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mapping the technological evolution of generative AI: a patent network analysis.

Navid Mohammadi, Jalil Heidary Dahooie, Amir Ali Bengari, Arash Rahimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Navid MohammadiCollege of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Jalil Heidary DahooieFaculty of Industrial and Technology Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. heidaryd@ut.ac.ir.
Amir Ali BengariDepartment of Industrial and Technology Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Arash RahimiCollege of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study systematically maps the technological evolution and innovation landscape of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) through a large-scale analysis of patent networks. Leveraging advanced text mining, network modeling, and community detection techniques on over 20,000 patents from Lens.org, we identify key technological domains, trace conceptual shifts, and highlight emerging trends across three major periods (pre-2016, 2016-2020, 2021-2025). Results reveal a pivotal transition post-2016 from early modular and domain-specific innovations, such as neuromorphic computing and bioengineering, toward integrated generative frameworks, API-driven platforms, and multi-modal capabilities. The post-2016 era is characterized by rapid growth in patent volume, increased conceptual diversity, and diminishing modularity, reflecting the convergence of previously distinct subfields. Key emergent clusters include generative AI frameworks, advanced medical imaging, personalized interactive systems, media authentication, and privacy-preserving AI. Notably, growing attention to content authenticity and user personalization underscores the interplay between technological maturation and societal concerns. Comparative analysis with baseline and alternative clustering models demonstrates the robustness and interpretability of the chosen network approach. While limited by reliance on English-language patents and TF-IDF extraction, this work provides an actionable roadmap for R&D leaders, policymakers, and investors to navigate the dynamic GAI landscape and informs future research directions involving multilingual and semantic-rich analyses.

Indexed as

Generative artificial intelligenceInnovation clustersNetwork modelingPatent analysisTechnology roadmapping

Identifiers

PMID41453986
PMCPMC12753650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.