ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced feature dynamic fusion gated UNet for robust retinal vessel segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a Deep learning model, the Enhanced Feature Dynamic Fusion-Gated U-Net (EFDG-UNet), for retinal vessel segmentation. To address challenges in segmenting small vessels, handling lesion interference, and adapting to multi-scale structures, the model incorporates optimized feature fusion, dynamic selection, and global position modeling. The Feature Navigation Hub (FN-Hub) captures long-range dependencies across multiple encoder layers, improving multi-scale vessel segmentation. The Adaptive Gated Residual Block (AGRB) uses a dynamic gating mechanism to enhance feature selectivity in lesion areas and low-contrast scenarios. The Parallel Focused Attention Module (PFAM) optimizes channel and spatial information for fine-grained vessel features. Experimental validation on DRIVE, CHASE_DB1, and STARE datasets shows that EFDG-UNet achieves state-of-the-art performance, attaining an AUC of 0.9932 and F1-score of 0.8469 on CHASE_DB1, and an AUC of 0.9886 and F1-score of 0.8412 on DRIVE. The model shows improved performance in low-contrast regions and complex vessel structures compared to baseline methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.