ArticleScientific reports2025
A structural model of perceived physical literacy of educational/sports college students based on PPLI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived physical literacy, self-reported physical activity, and sports video gaming among university students: a cross-sectional study.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2026Article
- Perceived physical literacy and subjective wellbeing in university students: the indirect association via autonomous sports motivation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using the Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument (PPLI), we explored the factor structure and constructed a structural model for the Perceived Physical Literacy (PL) of educational/sports college students. Content validity and consistency of PPLI (18 entries) were selected and validated. The questionnaire was contested to the educational/sports college's students, screened as the research participants. Using SPSS as a computational tool, exploratory factor analysis was conducted, followed by validation factor analysis to determine the factor structure of the structural model. The content validity I-CVI of the PPLI was 0.8-1 and the S-CVI was 0.93, which is satisfactory for content validity and consistency. The structural model was determined to be a 3-factor, 16-item factor structure with satisfactory validity. During exploratory factor analysis, all items loaded from 0.64 to 0.90 (Cronbach's alpha, 0.83-0.88). During exploratory factor analysis, all factor loadings ranged from 0.84 to 0.93. As an assessment tool, the PPLI is valid and reliable for perceived physical literacy among educational/sports college students. Our study observed that sports college students possess a relatively comprehensive range of perceptual PL phenomena. The affordances of the sport environment given maybe are not a sufficient condition for perceiving PL, and maybe not a necessary one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.