Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41453881›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Self-assembly pathways towards floppy colloidal square lattices.

Yogesh Shelke, Daniel J G Pearce, Daniela J Kraft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yogesh ShelkeSoft Matter Physics, Huygens-Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden Institute of Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Daniel J G PearceDepartment of Theoretical Physics, École de Physique, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniela J KraftSoft Matter Physics, Huygens-Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden Institute of Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. kraft@physics.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2221-6473

Funding

EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013)) ERC Starting Grant number 758383, RECONFMATSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) SNSF Starting Grant TMSGI2_211367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to rearrange is crucial for the function of proteins and biopolymers and governs many properties of materials. While rearranging bonds are needed to create floppy structures, it has remained largely unexplored how they affect the self-assembly pathways. We here use a binary colloidal model system equipped with surface-mobile DNA-based bonds to study how regular structures with tunable flexibility and square network symmetry can be created through self-assembly. We find that reconfigurability during self-assembly leads to lattices with square symmetry which are inherently mechanically unstable and hence thermally floppy. By considering the role of size ratio, number ratio, and directionality induced by particle shape, we identify the pathways that maximize the yield and flexibility of these square lattices using a combination of experiments, analytical calculations, and simulations. Our study highlights the crucial role of reconfigurability in systems that are governed by enthalpic and entropic principles, from synthetic to biological, and might be useful for creating materials with novel or reconfigurable properties.

Identifiers

PMID41453881
PMCPMC12847952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.