ArticleBMJ open2025
Association between cumulative radiation dose and haematological parameters among Korean radiation workers: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between cumulative radiation dose and haematological parameters among radiation workers and compare the prevalences of abnormalities in blood counts with those in the general population.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingNationwide radiation dose registry in Korea, linked with occupational health examination data. Cumulative doses were estimated using annual personal dose equivalent (H
participantsThe study included 20 414 radiation workers, comprising 17 651 men (86.5%) and 2763 women (13.5%), with baseline survey data, dosimetry records and at least one complete blood count (CBC) record between 2014 and 2019. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the continuous haematological parameters, including white blood cell (WBC), platelet (PLT) and haemoglobin (Hb) counts, in relation to cumulative radiation dose. Associations were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models incorporating repeated measurements and adjusting for age, smoking status and body mass index. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of abnormal blood counts among radiation workers.
resultsMost haematological parameters among radiation workers were within normal ranges. In male workers, cumulative radiation dose was associated with increased Hb levels (β=0.5 mg/dL per 1 mSv; 95% CI 0.006 to 0.9) after adjusting for age, smoking status and body mass index. No significant associations were observed between cumulative dose and WBC or PLT counts in either sex. Overall, compared with the general population, radiation workers had significantly lower standardised prevalence ratios for abnormal WBC and PLT counts.
conclusionNo substantial adverse changes in haematological parameters were found among radiation workers exposed to prolonged low-dose radiation. The findings suggest that cumulative doses at occupational levels may not substantially affect CBC profiles, although continued monitoring and follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.