ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Cardiac function assessment with deep-learning-based automatic segmentation of free-running four-dimensional whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07613398 (Assessment and Validation of the Established Free-Running Framework for Cardiac Function by Magnetic Resonance Imaging), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment and Validation of the Established Free-Running Framework for Cardiac Function by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FAST-CMR): An International Multi-Center, Multi-Vendor Study at 1.5T
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFree-running (FR) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables free-breathing electrocardiogram (ECG)-free fully dynamic five-dimensional (5D) (three-dimensional [3D] spatial+cardiac+respiration dimensions) imaging but poses significant challenges for clinical integration due to the volume of data and complexity of image analysis. Existing segmentation methods are tailored to two-dimensional (2D) cine or static 3D acquisitions and cannot leverage the unique spatial-temporal wealth of FR data. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL)-based segmentation framework for isotropic 3D+cardiac cycle FR cardiac MRI that enables accurate, fast, and clinically meaningful anatomical and functional analysis.
methodsFree-running, contrast-free balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) acquisitions at 1.5T and contrast-enhanced gradient-recalled echo (GRE) acquisitions at 3T were used to reconstruct motion-resolved 5D datasets. From these, the end-expiratory respiratory phase was retained to yield fully isotropic four-dimensional (4D) datasets. Automatic propagation of a limited set of manual segmentations was used to segment the left and right ventricular blood pool (LVB, RVB) and left-ventricular myocardium (LVM) on reformatted short-axis (SAX) end-systolic (ES) and end-diastolic (ED) images. These were used to train a 3D nnU-Net model. Validation was performed using geometric metrics (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], relative volume difference [RVD]), clinical metrics (ED and ES volumes, ejection fraction [EF]), and physiological consistency metrics (systole-diastole LVM volume mismatch and LV-RV stroke volume agreement). To assess the robustness and flexibility of the approach, we evaluated multiple additional DL training configurations, such as using 4D propagation-based data augmentation to incorporate all cardiac phases into training.
resultsThe main proposed method achieved automatic segmentation within a minute, delivering high geometric accuracy and consistency (DSC: 0.94 ± 0.01 [LVB], 0.86 ± 0.02 [LVM], 0.92 ± 0.01 [RVB]; RVD: 2.7%, 5.8%, 4.5%). Clinical LV metrics showed excellent agreement (ICC >0.98 for EDV/ESV/EF, bias <2 mL for EDV/ESV, <1% for EF), while RV metrics remained clinically reliable (ICC >0.93 for EDV/ESV/EF, bias <1 mL for EDV/ESV, <1% for EF) but exhibited wider limits of agreement. Training on all cardiac phases improved temporal coherence, reducing LVM volume mismatch from 4.0% to 2.6%.
conclusionThis study validates a DL-based method for fast and accurate segmentation of whole-heart free-running 4D cardiac MRI. Robust performance across diverse protocols and evaluation with complementary metrics that match state-of-the-art benchmarks supports its integration into clinical and research workflows, helping to overcome a key barrier to the broader adoption of free-running imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.