ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2026
Enhancing Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance in Lymphoma: A Rigorous Real-Time Central Review Process in AHOD2131.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) is important in any clinical trial with a radiation therapy (RT) component, it is paramount in lymphoma trials for several reasons. As lymphoma RT has evolved to use smaller and more complex treatment fields such as involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) and positron emission tomography (PET)-directed residual-site radiation therapy (pRSRT), accurate target delineation has become more challenging, especially when lymphoma patients comprise only a small proportion of most radiation oncologists' clinical practice. Furthermore, lymphoma is often a highly curable malignancy in young patients, augmenting the detrimental impact of suboptimal RT. The Children's Oncology Group trial AHOD2131 of frontline therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma incorporates real-time central review of PET scans, target volumes, and RT plans. Early experience shows that this rigorous approach identifies protocol deviations and enables timely corrections before treatment begins. Common errors include omitting initially involved disease sites, potentially due to inaccurate fusion of the PET and computed tomography with the simulation computed tomography, and over-generous contouring of target volumes. The AHOD2131 central review methodology may serve as a blueprint for RTQA in future lymphoma trials, improving treatment accuracy and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.