ArticleActa biomaterialia2026
Rapidly dissolving biomaterials for high-efficiency viral transduction.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell and gene therapy represent the frontier of genetic medicine for treating devastating diseases, yet they continue to face a critical bottleneck: inefficient genetic cell modification. While viral vectors remain our most powerful genetic delivery tools, their application suffers from significant transport insufficiencies with most viral particles wasted before reaching their cell targets. This fundamental challenge undermines the efficiency, safety, and economic viability of these potentially transformative therapies. Current transduction enhancers provide only partial solutions with significant drawbacks. RetroNectin works only with retroviruses and hematopoietic cells, spinoculation is time consuming and laborious, while polycationic polymers like polybrene pose toxicity concerns that preclude clinical applications. In this report, we introduce DUCTS (Dissolving Ultrafast Cell Transduction Sponges), a transduction enhancer based on uncrosslinked alginate cryogels that works within five minutes and completely dissolves, enabling rapid and easy workflows. DUCTS demonstrates broad versatility, boosting cell transduction across a variety of viral vectors (gamma retrovirus, lentivirus, and adeno-associated virus) in both suspension and adherent cells. Notably, DUCTS achieves comparable transduction efficiency while reducing viral concentration requirements by an order of magnitude compared to standard protocols. This cell- and virus-agnostic platform streamlines gene transfer procedures, reduces viral consumption and associated costs, and enhances the accessibility and scalability of cell and gene therapies. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this report, we present DUCTS (Dissolving Ultrafast Cell Transduction Sponges), a major advance to improve transduction technology, addressing critical bottlenecks in cell therapy manufacturing. Unlike existing methods that require lengthy procedures, specialized equipment, or toxic additives, DUCTS achieves comparable transduction efficiency in just five minutes using a simple, dissolving alginate sponge. This platform works across multiple virus types (lentivirus, retrovirus, AAV) and cell types, dramatically reducing viral vector requirements by 10-fold while maintaining cell viability. A modified DUCTs can also simultaneously activate and transduce T cells in a single step to revolutionize CAR-T cell manufacturing. With exceptional shelf stability and GMP-compatible materials, DUCTS offers a practical solution to reduce costs, accelerate production timelines, and enhance accessibility of life-saving cell therapies for patients worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.