ArticlePloS one2025
Controlling a simple model of bipedal walking to adapt to a wide range of target step lengths and step frequencies.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We tested whether the same control principles that support steady-state walking are sufficient for robust, and rapid gait adaptations over a wide range of step lengths and frequencies. We begin by demonstrating that periodic gaits exist at combinations of step frequency and step length that span the full range of gaits achievable by humans. However, their open-loop stability is not enough to rapidly transition to target gaits. Next, we show that actuating with only one push-off and one hip spring of fixed stiffness cannot fully control the walker in the entire gait space. We solve this by adding a second hip spring with an independent stiffness to actuate the second half of the swing phase. This allowed us to design local feedback controllers that provided rapid convergence to target gaits by making once-per-step adjustments to control inputs. To adapt to a range of target gaits that vary over time, we interpolated between local controllers. This policy performs well, accurately tracking rapidly varying combinations of target step length and step frequency with human-like response times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.