Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452911›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Controlling a simple model of bipedal walking to adapt to a wide range of target step lengths and step frequencies.

Sina Mehdizadeh, James Maxwell Donelan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sina MehdizadehDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-6176
James Maxwell DonelanDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-893X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested whether the same control principles that support steady-state walking are sufficient for robust, and rapid gait adaptations over a wide range of step lengths and frequencies. We begin by demonstrating that periodic gaits exist at combinations of step frequency and step length that span the full range of gaits achievable by humans. However, their open-loop stability is not enough to rapidly transition to target gaits. Next, we show that actuating with only one push-off and one hip spring of fixed stiffness cannot fully control the walker in the entire gait space. We solve this by adding a second hip spring with an independent stiffness to actuate the second half of the swing phase. This allowed us to design local feedback controllers that provided rapid convergence to target gaits by making once-per-step adjustments to control inputs. To adapt to a range of target gaits that vary over time, we interpolated between local controllers. This policy performs well, accurately tracking rapidly varying combinations of target step length and step frequency with human-like response times.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGaitModels, BiologicalWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumans

Identifiers

PMID41452911
PMCPMC12742788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.