Observational studyPloS one2025
Health disparities influence peripheral venous access insertion time in the emergency department: An observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective, multicenter study aimed to investigate disparities in peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement wait times among patients in emergency departments (EDs), focusing on the impact of factors such as race, sex, age, and comorbidities.
methodsElectronical health record (EHR) data from four EDs within Corewell Health System were analyzed for adult patients who underwent PIVC placement between January 1st, 2021 and January 31st, 2023. Multivariable linear regression models were employed to analyze associations between patient demographics (including race, sex, age, and comorbidities) and PIVC placement wait times. Adjustments were made for Charlson comorbidity index, emergency severity index, hospital size, obesity, and method of PIVC insertion.
resultsAmong 319,938 PIVC placements analyzed, significant disparities were observed: Black patients waited 9.65% longer for PIVC placement compared to White patients (p < 0.001). Women experienced a 6.67% longer wait time than men (p < 0.001). Obese and elderly patients also experienced prolonged wait times. These disparities persisted across both ultrasound-guided and traditionally placed PIVCs.
conclusionsThis study underscores substantial disparities in PIVC placement wait times in EDs, influenced by race, sex, age, and comorbidities. Addressing these disparities is crucial for improving equity in emergency care delivery. Future research should focus on implementing targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities and enhance timely access to essential medical interventions for all patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.