ArticlePloS one2025
Placental lesions in stillbirths: A case-control study using the Amsterdam criteria and predictive models at a UK tertiary unit.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe UK stillbirth rate remains higher than in many high-income countries, with placental disorders -particularly maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) lesions -linked to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This study examines placental lesions in stillbirth at one of the largest maternity units in the UK using the Amsterdam criteria for histological classification. It also retrospectively examines whether women with global/partial MVM - where most maternal decidual vessels show pathological changes but are only partially occluded- would have received aspirin and further surveillance if their placental dysfunction risk had been assessed using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm from the Tommy's app in their first trimester. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a case-control study of spontaneous non-anomalous stillbirths (≥24 weeks) at Sheffield maternity unit from 2018 to 2021 (n = 83). We then compared singleton stillbirths at term with matched livebirths. Placental lesions were categorised with the Amsterdam criteria. Using the FMF's algorithm which has only been recently introduced in our unit, we then retrospectively calculated the risk for placental dysfunction in women who experienced preterm PET stillbirth and also in those whose placentas showed global/partial MVM.
resultsMVM was the most common placental lesion in stillbirths, significantly more frequent than in livebirths (p < 0.001). The FMF algorithm had higher predictive accuracy for PET than the traditional NICE model in stillbirths [AUC: 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.86) vs 0.51 (95% CI 0.39-0.63), p = 0.03], but only when at least one continuous variable such as PAPP-A was included. In women with stillbirth and whose placentas showed global/partial MVM, first-trimester placental risk assessment using the FMF algorithm during the first trimester would have identified most of them as high risk [FMF AUC: 0.7 (0.58-0.80), p = 0.02].
conclusionMVM is frequently found in stillbirths. Our retrospective placental dysfunction risk assessment suggests that Tommy's algorithm would have more accurately identified women who went onto experience stillbirth with significant MVM lesions as high risk, leading to aspirin treatment and closer monitoring. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and potentially enhance placental dysfunction screening to reduce stillbirth rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.