ArticlePloS one2025
Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDelays in innovative drug registration across countries, or the "drug approval lag", can cause inequities in treatment access, thereby worsening patient outcomes. Registration delays hinder the first step in making treatments available, and are often linked to regulatory inefficiencies, constrained healthcare financing, and fragmented decision-making. Since late 2019, Lebanon's health system has faced overlapping socioeconomic and political crises, yet their impact on innovative medication registration remains undocumented. This study aimed to measure this impact by comparing Lebanon's drug approval lag before (2014-2019) and after (2020-2024) the crisis and to develop an interpretive framework exploring the rationale behind an informal policy to delay innovative medication registration.
methodsA mixed-methods approach was adopted. Innovative medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2014 and 2024 were included and compared to local registration timelines in Lebanon. In-depth interviews with policymakers, industry leaders, and healthcare providers informed the interpretive framework.
resultsFindings revealed a dramatic fall in innovative medication registrations post-crisis over these two periods. The proportion of FDA-approved innovative medications registered in Lebanon dropped from 43.6% to 0% and EMA-approved medications dropped from 59.4% to 0%. Pre-crisis, average registration time was under two years; post-crisis, delays are estimated to exceed four years. Our interpretive framework suggests the intermediate effects of delaying innovative medication registration are mainly to control costs and reduce reimbursement pressures on the Ministry of Public Health. However, key stakeholders believe the resulting negative consequences, such as reduced access to life-saving treatments and greater dependence on parallel market importation, outweigh the short-term benefits.
conclusionHealth systems are complex adaptive systems, where policies affecting innovative drug approvals may not only delay access, but also trigger unintended consequences. In Lebanon, the registration of innovative medications should remain independent from reimbursement decisions and grounded in evidence-informed health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.