ArticlePloS one2025
Short-term simulation training course improves basic obstetric ultrasound operational skills of residents: A multi-center study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate effectiveness of a short-term simulation-based obstetric ultrasound training course.
methods21 inexperienced trainees and 44 experienced trainees participated in a short-term course about obstetric ultrasound operational skills, which was designed into four task modules. Participants deliberately practiced on simulators for one hour at each module. Their pre-training and post-training operational skill levels were assessed using Obstetric ultrasound competency assessment tool. Likert scale was used to learn about trainees' confidence before and after training, and their satisfaction with the simulated training course.
resultsScores of inexperienced and experienced trainees after training were significantly higher than those before training (inexperienced trainees 20.48 ± 10.64 vs 61.80 ± 15.40, P < 0.001; experienced trainees 39.83 ± 15.00 vs 76.26 ± 12.16, P < 0.001). The passing rate increased from 0% to 90.5% for inexperienced trainees, and from 31.8% to 97.7% for experienced trainees (all P < 0.001). The mastery learning rate increased from 0% to 23.8% for inexperienced trainees, and from 0% to 70.5% for experienced trainees (all P < 0.001). Trainees' confidence in obstetric ultrasound examination also significantly improved compared to pre-training (2.66 ± 1.12 vs 3.98 ± 0.50, P < 0.001). Most trainees believed that simulation training could help them acquire standardized ultrasound planes (58/60), form organized thinking of scanning (59/60) and improve their competence in following clinical practice (54/60).
conclusionsBoth inexperienced and experienced trainees can benefit from the short-term simulation training course. Trainees demonstrated strong training satisfaction with the simulation training course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.