ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Exploring leprosy perceptions in South Sulawesi, Indonesia: A mixed-methods study on knowledge, attitudes, practices, and stigma.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leprosy-related stigma has a profound impact on affected individuals and their communities. Embedded within the MetLep trial of adjunctive metformin for multibacillary leprosy, we explored knowledge and perceptions of leprosy in endemic communities in Sulawesi, Indonesia. We conducted a mixed-methods cross-sectional study using interview-administered questionnaires and qualitative methods. Quantitative data were collected using the 'NLR Perception Toolkit', including a knowledge-questionnaire, the EMIC-Community Stigma Scale (EMIC-CCS) and the Social Distance Scale (SDS). Semi-structured interviews (SSIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted to gain in-depth insights into perceived stigma, fears related to leprosy, care-seeking behaviour and access to healthcare. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and multivariate analyses, while qualitative data were analyzed using inductive coding and content analysis. A total of 402 participants completed the questionnaires: 75 affected by leprosy (18.7%), 126 close contacts (31.3%), 150 community members (37.3%), and 51 healthcare workers (12.7%). Most participants were female (75.6%), with a median age of 42.0 years (IQR 32.3-52.0). Twenty-five individuals participated in SSIs and FGDs. Mean knowledge-score was low (3.0; SD 2.0; range 0-9), particularly regarding leprosy symptoms, cause, and transmission. Misconceptions included hereditary transmission and transmission through animal feces, sexual contact, or intercourse during menstruation. Mean EMIC-CSS and SDS scores were 11.2 (7.1; 0-28) and 8.7 (4.1; 0-21), respectively, with the highest stigma levels among community members. Qualitative findings revealed that care seeking experiences and perceived stigma were complex and context specific. Leprosy was locally referred to as "kandala", a term with negative socio-cultural connotations, and was often associated with witchcraft, sinful behavior, and moral transgression. Persons affected by leprosy reported community rejection, social exclusion, and avoidance of physical contact. Institutional stigma persisted within national leprosy programs. Addressing leprosy stigma requires context-specific, stigma-sensitive educational and public health interventions, supported by sustained political commitment and adequate funding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.