ArticlePloS one2025
Collaborative and co-Ordinated action for Medication Safety (COMS): Experience-based co-design of an intervention blueprint to improve general practice and community pharmacy collaboration.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A qualitative study on the challenges in deprescribing for elderly patients with polypharmacy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor communication is a key causal factor of medication safety incidents. Collaboration between community pharmacy (CP) and general practice (GP) staff is essential but hindered by multiple barriers. This study applied an Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) approach, incorporating Systems Thinking for Everyday Work (STEW), to develop interventions for improving collaboration and communication on medication safety across the GP-CP interface. A sequential study design was undertaken, including: 1) an experience gathering phase to understand the communication of medication safety issues across the GP-CP interface, involving online focus groups and interviews with 27 GP and CP staff; and 2) two online EBCD workshops with 21 participants, including patients and primary care staff, to generate and prioritise interventions for improving medication safety communication and collaboration. Focus groups, interviews and workshops were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed. Three key touchpoints for communication and collaboration on medication safety issues were identified: medication errors, medication changes, and potential patient safety concerns. An absence of shared communication approaches and the prioritisation of medication safety issues, one way communication tools, lack of understanding of professional roles and of incident reporting processes were barriers to communication and collaboration. Facilitators included GP pharmacist-community pharmacist relationships, face-to-face interactions and staff continuity. Five key interventions were suggested: development/modification of an electronic two-way communication tool between GP and CP; centralisation and sharing of patient records; interprofessional education; co-location of general practices and community pharmacies; and a toolkit for improving medication safety across the GP-CP interface. Participants agreed that a toolkit to address key communication and collaboration issues arising at multiple touchpoints should be prioritised for development and discussions led to refinement of ideas and production of a toolkit blueprint. Further research is required to refine toolkit resources, establish an implementation pathway, and evaluate its effectiveness to support adoption and improvements in medication safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.