Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452825›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Machine learning-based prediction of glioma grading.

Shihong Liu, Yunfang Xie, Xuanli Gong, Jieyu He, Wei Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shihong LiuSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yunfang XieSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xuanli GongSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6448-8002
Jieyu HeSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Wei ZouSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-2790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGliomas are among the most common and heterogeneous primary tumours of the central nervous system. Accurate grading is essential for treatment planning and prognosis, yet conventional histopathological approaches are limited by subjectivity and poor reproducibility. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model that integrates clinical and molecular characteristics to improve early glioma grading, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy and supporting individualized treatment strategies.

methodsAn efficient prediction model for low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and glioblastoma (grade IV, GBM) was developed by utilizing the clinical and molecular characteristics of gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. A novel integration of recursive feature elimination (RFE) with random forest (RF) and elastic net regression (ENR) was implemented to select features efficiently. Additionally, the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was applied to balance the training set, and K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and other algorithms were optimized through random-search hyper-parameter optimization (HPO) with five-fold cross-validation, yielding nine distinct machine learning (ML) models. Ultimately, by applying the voting and stacking algorithms, 34 ensemble learning models were constructed. Furthermore, all the models were externally validated using the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) dataset. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to elucidate the prediction processes of the ensemble models.

resultsFeature selection revealed 11 key grading features, including Tumour Protein 53 (TP53) and Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). Among the 9 basic models constructed by combining optimization techniques such as SMOTE, the RF model had the best performance (Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.916 for TCGA and 0.797 for CGGA). Among the 34 integrated models constructed, the Voting25 model integrating RF, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and KNN achieved AUC values of 0.928 and 0.794, respectively, on the TCGA and CGGA datasets, demonstrating overall optimal predictive performance.

conclusionEleven key features have been identified that facilitate molecular detection and personalized targeted therapy for glioma. Nine models were developed and optimized, and the RF model was observed to provide the best performance, potentially guiding future ML-related research in glioma. Additionally, the voting ensemble method, which integrates RF, XGBoost, and KNN, was shown to achieve superior performance, thereby enhancing both accuracy and robustness. Finally, all the models were successfully validated on the CGGA dataset, indicating strong generalizability.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMachine LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingPrognosisSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID41452825
PMCPMC12742763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.