Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452822›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Automated Machine Learning Pipeline: Large Language Models-Assisted Automated Data set Generation for Training Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials.

Adam Lahouari, Jutta Rogal, Mark E Tuckerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam LahouariDepartment of Chemistry, NYU, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5857-1066
Jutta RogalDepartment of Chemistry, NYU, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-380X
Mark E TuckermanDepartment of Chemistry, NYU, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2194-9955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have become powerful tools to extend molecular simulations beyond the limits of quantum methods, offering near-quantum accuracy at much lower computational cost. Yet, developing reliable MLIPs remains difficult because it requires generating high-quality data sets, preprocessing atomic structures, and carefully training and validating models. In this work, we introduce an Automated Machine Learning Pipeline (AMLP) that unifies the entire workflow from data set creation to model validation. AMLP employs large-language-model agents to assist with electronic-structure code selection, input preparation, and output conversion, while its analysis suite (AMLP-Analysis) based on ASE supports a range of molecular simulations. The pipeline is built on the MACE architecture and validated on acridine polymorphs, where with a straightforward fine-tuning of a foundation model mean absolute errors of 1.7 meV/atom in energies and 7.0 meV/Å in forces are achieved. The fitted MLIP reproduces DFT geometries with sub-Å accuracy and demonstrates stability during molecular dynamics simulations in the microcanonical and canonical ensemble.

Identifiers

PMID41452822
PMCPMC12805562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.