ArticleJournal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology2026
Clinician and Client Reports of the Negative Effects of Neuropsychological Assessment for Dementia.
Article in Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveNeuropsychological assessment (NPA) is recommended to support differential diagnosis of dementia but little is known about its impact on clients and their experience of negative effects. This study investigated clinicians' understanding of their clients' negative experiences and explored similarities in clinician and client reports.MethodA mixed-methods approach was employed using qualitative and quantitative data. Semi-structured interviews with clinicians, and a questionnaire for clinicians and clients were collected from NHS settings across Scotland. Reflexive Thematic Analysis was used to analyse 11 clinician interviews. Descriptive statistics were reported for the 25 clinician and 12 client questionnaires and exploratory analysis investigated associations between clinician and clients reporting of negative experiences.ResultsIn the qualitative analysis, three overarching themes and 13 sub-themes were identified. The over-arching themes were: assessment can produce negative impacts for clients, indirect factors can produce harmful effects, and clinicians can take action to reduce adverse effects of NPA. For the questionnaire responses, the most endorsed negative effects were the same for clients and clinicians and included feeling stressed, worried, disappointed with their performance in assessment, frustrated, critical of themselves and worried about the outcome.ConclusionThese data provide some of the first clear empirical descriptions of the negative effects of NPA as reported by both clinicians and clients. The study also identified challenges with recruiting clients who are willing to give feedback on their experience of assessment. Future studies are needed to refine the available data capture methods and to determine if the current results are replicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.