Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452583›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2026

Prognostic Factors and Nomogram-Based Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastasis Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Xiaoxu Ge, Guanli Yang, Huiming Wu, Lei Liu, Ming Zhou, Akao Zhu, Xiangxing Kong, Jingjing Wu, Yeting Hu, Kefeng Ding and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaoxu GeDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2533-9057
Guanli YangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Huiming WuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lei LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ming ZhouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Akao ZhuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiangxing KongDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jingjing WuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yeting HuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7483-4380
Kefeng DingDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-3717
Lifeng SunDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 226-2022-00009Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 226-2024-00176the Key R&D Program of Zhejiang 2023C03049the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project 2024ZD0520100the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LMS25H160014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous peritoneal metastasis (SPM) presents poor prognosis and complex treatment challenges. This study aimed to identify independent prognostic factors and develop nomogram-based prediction models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in CRC patients with SPM (CRC-SPM) undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 218 CRC-SPM treated with CRS between October 2010 and April 2022. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Nomogram models were constructed based on these factors, and their predictive accuracy was assessed using calibration curves, ROC curves, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA).

resultsFor OS, independent factors included age > 65 years (HR = 2.464, p = 0.005), N2 stage (HR = 2.720, p = 0.005), > 13 lymph nodes resected (HR = 0.496, p = 0.018), and postoperative chemotherapy (HR = 0.300, p = 0.020). For PFS, independent factors were age > 65 years (HR = 1.578, p = 0.040), concurrent liver metastasis (HR = 1.664, p = 0.016), > 14 PCI score (HR = 1.630, p = 0.031), and presence of ascites (HR = 1.706, p = 0.011). Nomogram models for predicting OS and PFS had AUC values of 0.717, 0.759, and 0.773 for OS, and 0.659, 0.689, and 0.790 for PFS at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively.

conclusionThis study identified key prognostic factors and developed reliable nomogram models for predicting OS and PFS in CRC-SPM. The findings highlight the importance of postoperative chemotherapy and intraoperative lymph node dissection and suggest focusing on high-risk factors such as age and N2 stage in clinical practice. The nomogram models provide a valuable tool for personalized prognosis assessment and treatment planning.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresNomogramsPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studiescolorectal cancercytoreductive surgeryprognostic factorssynchronous peritoneal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID41452583
PMCPMC12742547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.