ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Rational design and structural Bioinformatics-Driven discovery of tetrapeptide inhibitors for LIMK-Targeted cancer therapy.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual Activity Microbial Peptides Catalog.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
LIM kinases (LIMK1 and LIMK2) serve as critical regulators of microtubule dynamics and mitotic progression, positioning them as promising targets for cancer therapy. However, most existing LIMK inhibitors lack specificity and cause toxic side effects due to the high sequence conservation between LIMK isoforms. Notably, no peptide-based inhibitors targeting the conserved ATP-binding pocket of LIMKs have been systematically investigated to date. To address this, an integrative structural bioinformatics approach, such as virtual screening of oligopeptide libraries, molecular dynamics simulations (MDS), and binding free energy analyses, was implemented to identify selective and less toxic peptide inhibitors. Among the top candidates, peptides with known anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and anti-angiogenic properties were prioritized. Interaction profiling revealed four and five tetrapeptides that closely mimicked interactions of LIMKi3 (BMS-5), a known Type-I inhibitor, with LIMK1 and LIMK2, respectively were shortlisted. Notably, MD and binding free energy analyses identified WRHF as a potent LIMK1 inhibitor with greater affinity than LIMKi3, while YYRW and WWHW exhibited superior stability and binding strength toward LIMK2. Overall, WRHF (LIMK1), YYRW, and WWHW (LIMK2) emerged as stable and high-affinity tetrapeptide inhibitors, demonstrating strong potential as selective, low-toxicity therapeutics for LIMK-targeted cancer treatment. However, in vitro and in vivo validation are essential to confirm their inhibitory efficacy and therapeutic potential, paving the way for the development of next-generation anti-cancer agents with reduced off-target effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41452532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.