Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452532›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Rational design and structural Bioinformatics-Driven discovery of tetrapeptide inhibitors for LIMK-Targeted cancer therapy.

Nagarajan Hemavathy, Sampathkumar Ranganathan, Vetrivel Umashankar, Jeyaraman Jeyakanthan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nagarajan HemavathyStructural Biology and Bio-Computing Lab, Department of Bioinformatics, Science Block, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, 630 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sampathkumar RanganathanCentre for Bioinformatics, KBIRVO, Vision Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Vetrivel UmashankarVirology & Biotechnology/Bioinformatics Division, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, 600 031, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jeyaraman JeyakanthanStructural Biology and Bio-Computing Lab, Department of Bioinformatics, Science Block, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, 630 003, Tamil Nadu, India. jjbioinformatics@gmail.com.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India DBT-NNP No.BT/PR40156/BTIS/137/54/2023Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/09/IF90083MDRD-RUSA F.24e51/2014-UPromotion of University Research and Scientific ExcellenceIndia No. SR/PURSE Phase 2/38(G), 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LIM kinases (LIMK1 and LIMK2) serve as critical regulators of microtubule dynamics and mitotic progression, positioning them as promising targets for cancer therapy. However, most existing LIMK inhibitors lack specificity and cause toxic side effects due to the high sequence conservation between LIMK isoforms. Notably, no peptide-based inhibitors targeting the conserved ATP-binding pocket of LIMKs have been systematically investigated to date. To address this, an integrative structural bioinformatics approach, such as virtual screening of oligopeptide libraries, molecular dynamics simulations (MDS), and binding free energy analyses, was implemented to identify selective and less toxic peptide inhibitors. Among the top candidates, peptides with known anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and anti-angiogenic properties were prioritized. Interaction profiling revealed four and five tetrapeptides that closely mimicked interactions of LIMKi3 (BMS-5), a known Type-I inhibitor, with LIMK1 and LIMK2, respectively were shortlisted. Notably, MD and binding free energy analyses identified WRHF as a potent LIMK1 inhibitor with greater affinity than LIMKi3, while YYRW and WWHW exhibited superior stability and binding strength toward LIMK2. Overall, WRHF (LIMK1), YYRW, and WWHW (LIMK2) emerged as stable and high-affinity tetrapeptide inhibitors, demonstrating strong potential as selective, low-toxicity therapeutics for LIMK-targeted cancer treatment. However, in vitro and in vivo validation are essential to confirm their inhibitory efficacy and therapeutic potential, paving the way for the development of next-generation anti-cancer agents with reduced off-target effects.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsComputational BiologyLim KinasesNeoplasmsOligopeptidesProtein Kinase InhibitorsDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAntineoplastic AgentsLIMK1 protein, humanLIMK2 protein, humanLim KinasesOligopeptidesProtein Kinase InhibitorsBinding energyLIMKsMolecular dynamicsPeptide inhibitorsVirtual screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.