ArticleCarbon balance and management2025
Carbon mitigation effect of service trade innovation: quasi-experimental evidence from China.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maritime carbon tax's impact on China's shipping industry: economy and carbon reduction.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Beyond emissions: a stochastic cusp-logit analysis of environmental cost regimes in BRICS.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- An empirical study of the impact of environmental regulation on the eco-efficiency of digital agriculture: a quasi-natural experiment based on China's carbon emissions trading pilot policy.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Synergistic emission reduction mechanism of command-and-control and market-based incentives: an empirical study based on core firms in supply chains.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines the environmental impact of service trade innovation in the context of China's dual-carbon goals. Leveraging the staggered difference-in-differences combined with double/debiased machine learning strategy, we identify the causal effect of the Service Trade Innovation and Development Pilot Policy on urban carbon emissions. Results show that the policy reduced emissions by an average of 8.9%. The carbon mitigation effect is more pronounced in coastal cities, those with more developed service sectors, and non-Two Control Zones. The examination of the fundamental mechanisms identifies four primary channels: the intensified enforcement of low-carbon policies, progress in green innovation, the expansion of regional market integration, and the improvement of urban trade networks. Spatial spillover analysis indicates significant carbon reductions within 0-100 km of pilot cities, but a rebound effect in the 100-500 km range, possibly due to resource agglomeration. These results underscore the environmental benefits associated with reforms in service trade and emphasize the necessity for regionally coordinated approaches to promote spatial equity in the implementation of low-carbon transition initiatives. JEL CLASSIFICATION: O14; Q56; Q58; R11.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.