ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Microbiota relationship between breast, colorectal, and lung cancer types.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Tumor Microbiota Identifies a Metastatic-Specific Bacterial Signature, HighlightingOncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC), breast cancer (BC), and lung cancer (LC) are among the most common and deadly malignancies worldwide. In recent years, the role of tumor-associated microbiota in the initiation and progression of cancer has attracted increasing attention. However, studies examining different cancer types together with their clinical stages remain limited. The aim of this study was to compare the composition of tumor tissue microbiota across three cancer types and different disease stages. For this purpose, DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples, and sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene region was performed. Microbial profiles were analyzed at the phylum and genus levels, and diversity indices were compared between groups. In stage III LC samples, the phylum Cyanobacteria was found to be markedly more abundant compared to other stages. In CRC, the phylum Firmicutes was most abundant in stage III tumors, showing higher levels than in early stages. In metastatic cases (advanced stages), both the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) count and Shannon diversity index were found to be highly similar to those of LC control tissues but markedly lower than those of the CRC control group. Across all cancer types, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes were identified as the dominant phyla, though their relative abundances varied by cancer type and stage. The findings suggest that tumor-associated microbiota composition exhibits distinct signatures depending on tumor type and progression stage. Similarities observed between certain cancer types and stages may indicate the presence of shared microbial patterns within the tumor microenvironment. Such microbial signatures may serve as potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, or therapeutic targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41452506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.