Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Acute effects of flossing band application on hamstring muscle mechanical properties and stretch tolerance: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor : Acute effects of flossing band application on hamstring muscle mechanical properties and stretch tolerance: a randomized controlled crossover trial.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFlossing bands have been reported to improve hamstring flexibility; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated whether increases in range of motion (ROM) result from changes in muscle mechanical properties, stretch tolerance, or both.
methodsSixteen healthy adult males (27.0 ± 2.9 years) participated in a randomized crossover trial with two conditions: a flossing condition (FLOSS), in which a compression elastic band was wrapped around the thigh and participants performed four passive twisting-like movements followed by two sets of 20 active knee extension stretches; and a sham condition (SHAM) using an ice wrap with the same stretching protocol. Maximal passive knee extension ROM, passive knee flexion torque during passive joint movement, and the shear modulus of the biceps femoris long head (BFlh), semitendinosus (ST), and semimembranosus (SM) were measured before (Pre) and after the intervention (Post).
resultsResults revealed that knee extension ROM increased significantly in both conditions, but was greater in FLOSS (+ 10.5%) than SHAM (+ 2.9%, P < 0.05). Peak passive flexion torque increased significantly only in FLOSS (+ 11.1%, P < 0.05), indicating enhanced stretch tolerance. Shear modulus significantly decreased in the BFlh (− 8.7%) and SM (− 7.9%) after FLOSS, with post-intervention BFlh values lower than SHAM (P < 0.05). No significant changes were found in the ST in either FLOSS or SHAM.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate that flossing acutely increases knee extension ROM through a combination of decreased passive mechanical properties in specific hamstring muscles and enhanced stretch tolerance. Flossing may serve as a strategy to improve flexibility and aid hamstring injury prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41452474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.