ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Research: A Bibliometric Analysis with Retrospective Clinical Validation.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge mapping of alström syndrome research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis based on WoS data from 2000 to 2025.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- The relationship between the latent profiles of alexithymia and self-disclosure in female patients with pelvic floor dysfunction.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), primarily manifesting as pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI), is a prevalent condition that severely impairs women's quality of life. While management strategies exist, outcomes are often suboptimal, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of research trends and their clinical relevance.
methodsThis study employed a mixed-methods exploratory design. First, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 23,005 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection (2003-2023) was conducted to map the global PFD research landscape, identify key trends, and detect thematic shifts. Second, to contextualize these findings, a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes from 350 women with moderate PFD who received standardized pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) was performed. Pre- and post-treatment pelvic floor muscle function (via surface electromyography) and anatomical support (via perineal ultrasound) were compared.
resultsBibliometric analysis revealed a significant acceleration in publications after 2011, led by the United States, China, and the United Kingdom. Keyword analysis identified a clear thematic shift from a focus on surgical management (pre-2018) towards prevention, rehabilitation, and quality of life (post-2018), with PFMT emerging as a prominent research hotspot. The retrospective clinical analysis demonstrated that after one to two courses of PFMT, patients showed statistically significant improvements in muscle strength, endurance, and resting tone (all p < 0.01). These functional gains were corroborated by ultrasound evidence of pelvic organ elevation and a reduced levator hiatus area.
conclusionsBy synergistically integrating macro-level bibliometric trends with micro-level clinical evidence, this study provides a holistic overview of the evolving PFD research landscape. The alignment of a growing academic focus on conservative management with real-world clinical outcomes from a PFMT cohort suggests a paradigm shift towards function-oriented, patient-centered care and highlights its role as a cornerstone of PFD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41452457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.