Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452437›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Antitumor effects of morphine and tramadol on lung metastasis of melanoma tumor cells in vitro and in vivo.

Thamires Barreto Sancho, Ana Katarina Menezes da Cruz Soares, Mario Ferreira Conceição Santos, Vivian Fernanda Barbosa, Fábio Medeiros de Azevedo, Hugo Alexandre Oliveira Rocha, Aldo da Cunha Medeiros

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thamires Barreto SanchoHealth Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Ana Katarina Menezes da Cruz SoaresDepartment of Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, UFRN, Biosciences Center, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Mario Ferreira Conceição SantosDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Federal University of Espirito Santo, UFES, Center for Exact, Natural and Health Sciences, Alegre, ES, Brazil. mariosantos408@gmail.com.
Vivian Fernanda BarbosaSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Brazil.
Fábio Medeiros de AzevedoPathological Anatomy Laboratory Unit, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, UFRN, Brazilian Hospital Services Company, HUOL, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Hugo Alexandre Oliveira RochaDepartment of Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, UFRN, Biosciences Center, Natal, RN, Brazil. hugo-alexandre@uolcom.br.
Aldo da Cunha MedeirosDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN, Natal, RN, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphine and tramadol are analgesic agents commonly employed in the management of cancer pain. Morphine’s effects on tumor cell growth can be either inhibitory or stimulatory, depending on various factors; however, data regarding tramadol’s impact on melanoma is lacking. The present study aimed to compare the effects of morphine and tramadol on melanoma cells both in vitro and in vivo, to provide further insights into their potential as adjuvant therapeutic agents in melanoma management. Both drugs demonstrated dose-dependent cytotoxicity against B16F10 melanoma cells, achieving a maximum effect of 80% at a concentration of 5.0 μM. Notably, at this concentration, morphine induced greater apoptosis (49%) compared to tramadol (37%). In clonogenic assays, tramadol (0.5 μM) inhibited colony formation by 80%, whereas morphine at the same concentration completely (100%) inhibited colony formation. Both morphine and tramadol significantly reduced the formation of metastases in mice (p < 0.05), with morphine showing a greater reduction in lung tumorigenicity compared to tramadol (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the combination of tramadol at a clinical dose (2.00 μM) with cisplatin (0.0312 μM) enhanced inhibition of cell proliferation compared to cisplatin alone (p < 0.05). In summary, data from in vivo experiments indicated that both drugs induced a significant reduction in tumor size, as well as in the number of metastases. However, morphine was more effective than tramadol. Further research is needed to evaluate antitumor effects of clinical doses of morphine and to explore the potential of tramadol as a substitute for morphine as adjuvant drug in antitumor treatment and pain management of melanoma patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLung NeoplasmsMelanoma, ExperimentalMorphineTramadolAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCisplatinDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAnalgesics, OpioidAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinMorphineTramadolAntimelanoma activityMelanoma cancerMorphineOpioidsTramadol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.