ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Do enlarged white matter perivascular spaces reflect brain clearance dysfunction? Insights from intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVisible perivascular spaces of cerebral white matter at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were in several studies proposed to be an integral part of brain-wide perivascular clearance pathways, and their enlargement could therefore serve as markers of perivascular clearance dysfunction. We studied whether MRI-visible perivascular spaces in subcortical white matter communicate with subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
methodsMRI-visible perivascular spaces of the basal ganglia served as controls. Intrathecal 0.5 mmol gadobutrol was utilized as CSF tracer, and T1-weighted MRI was performed before, and at multiple time points after (3, 6, 24 and 48 h) injection. Perivascular spaces with diameter ≥ 2 mm were included in the analysis, and a circular region of interest was placed manually within one perivascular space and in adjacent brain parenchyma of each region.
resultsThe study included 27 symptomatic individuals undergoing clinical work-up of various CSF circulation disorders, but in whom no treatable condition was found. Perivascular spaces of both white matter and basal ganglia enhanced with intrathecal gadobutrol, confirming CSF exchange with perivascular spaces. While perivascular spaces of basal ganglia enhanced most with peak at 6 h (233.2% [34.9 to 431.5%]) (p < 0.01), coinciding with peak enhancement in subarachnoid CSF, perivascular spaces of white matter enhanced less and more slowly with peak at 48 h (159.1% [37.9 to 280.3%]) (p < 0.01).
conclusionsThe various degrees of CSF exchange with MRI-visible subcortical perivascular spaces suggest these may be dilated for different reasons, therefore questioning their validity as markers of perivascular clearance function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.