ArticleProteomics2026
Performance Characteristics of Zeno Trap Scanning DIA for Sensitive and Quantitative Proteomics at High Throughput.
Article in Proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the Design and Functionality of a Compact Multi-Reflecting Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2026Article
- Proteome-guided drug discovery maps and mitigates therapeutic degrader toxicity.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Development of a metabolomic LC-QTOF method for bioactive compound production control in plant cell cultures.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A Parallel Accumulation-Mobility Aligned Fragmentation Strategy Utilizing High-Resolution Ion Mobility for High-Performance Proteomics Analysis.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- High-Throughput Proteomics Sample Preparation Using a 96-Channel Pipettor and Magnetic Pin Device.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Performance Characteristics of Zeno Trap Scanning DIA for Sensitive and Quantitative Proteomics at High Throughput.Proteomics · 2026Article
- Cross-platform clinical proteomics using the Charité open standard for plasma proteomics (OSPP).Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteomic experiments, particularly those addressing dynamic proteome properties, time series, or genetic diversity, require the analysis of large sample numbers. Despite significant advancements in proteomic technologies in recent years, further improvements are needed to accelerate measurement and enhance proteome coverage and quantitative performance. Previously, we demonstrated that incorporating a scanning MS2 dimension into data-independent acquisition (DIA) methods (Scanning SWATH, or more generally scanning DIA), but also ion trapping, improves analytical depth and quantitative performance, especially in proteomic methods using fast chromatography. Here, we evaluate the scanning DIA approach combined with ion trapping via the Zeno trap in a method termed ZT Scan DIA, using a ZenoTOF 7600+ instrument (SCIEX). Applying this method to established proteome standards across various analytical setups, enabling intermediate to high sample throughput, we observed a 30%-40% increase in identified precursors. This enhancement extended to overall protein identification and precise quantification. Furthermore, ZT Scan DIA effectively eliminated quantitative bias, as demonstrated by its ability to deconvolute proteomes in multi-species mixtures. We propose that ZT Scan DIA can be used for a broad range of applications in proteomics, particularly in studies requiring high quantitative precision with low sample input and high-throughput workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.