Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41452048›Full record

ReviewACS infectious diseases2026

Negamycin: Nature's Forgotten Antibiotic.

Grant A Boyle, Gregory S Basarab

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grant A BoyleHolistic Drug Discovery and Development (H3D) Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0005-7185-5203
Gregory S BasarabHolistic Drug Discovery and Development (H3D) Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5684-6046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negamycin is a natural product antibiotic discovered in 1970 and shown to have a Gram-negative spectrum of activity. It has served as the starting point in drug discovery efforts due in large part to its structural simplicity and novel mode of inhibition of the bacterial ribosome. It follows that negamycin does not show cross-resistance with other antibacterial agents that operate on the ribosome, whether this would be due to target modification, drug efflux, or drug metabolism. Because of the deficiencies of current drug regimens for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens, having a new agent brought to the infectious disease formulary represents a critical medical need, as has been promoted by the World Health Organization and other entities. Negamycin has been the subject of over 20 total syntheses, often highlighting stereoselective chemistry toward installing its two chiral centers on an acyclic chain. Novel synthetic methodologies thereby developed can stimulate the synthesis of novel analogs. With this, progress has been made in devising more potent analogs than negamycin. Structural work has determined that negamycin binds to the A-site of the 30S ribosome encounter complex with tRNA. Advancements have been made to understand the mechanism of transport of negamycin to the bacterial cytoplasm to enable engagement of the ribosome. This review surveys much of what has been published around negamycin and its analogs, including aspects of the biological spectrum of activity and mode of action as well as limitations that have held back clinical development.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsNebramycinBiological ProductsGram-Negative BacteriaHumansRibosomesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological ProductsNebramycinantibacterialsnegamycinpharmacokineticsprotein biosynthesis inhibitionribosomestructure-activity relationshiptotal synthesis

Identifiers

PMID41452048
PMCPMC12797225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.