SynthesisDementia (London, England)2026
The Experience of People With Dementia in Accessing and Engaging in Talking Therapies for Mental Health Difficulties: A Systematic Review and Thematic Meta-Synthesis.
Synthesis in Dementia (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with dementia often experience psychological distress, and may experience difficulty in navigating changes to their cognition, identity and quality of life, yet experience challenges in accessing and engaging in talking therapies. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis to explore the experiences of people with dementia in accessing talking therapies by incorporating the perspectives of people with dementia, caregivers and dementia care professionals. We searched PsychINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science in March 2024 and included empirical peer reviewed studies that had qualitative data focussing on accessing, delivering or participating in talking therapies, from the perspective or people with dementia, their caregivers, or professionals. Only English language studies were included. 15 studies were included. Across the studies, qualitative data was collected from 88 people with dementia, 96 caregivers/family members/supportive others, 38 professionals and seven community stakeholders. Quality assessment was conducted using a revised version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research. Talking therapies can help people with dementia to address, process, and accept difficult life situations, whilst also improving their knowledge on dementia and positively impacting their relationships with significant others. However, to maximise benefits, several adjustments are necessary, including, adjusting the length of therapy sessions, increased therapy reminders and follow-up, tailored communication, use of group sessions and improving staff's dementia knowledge. Additionally, the use of dementia-specific tools, alongside outcome measures that measure broader wellbeing constructs are recommended. Involving people with dementia, caregivers and dementia professionals in therapy planning and delivery can also improve outcomes. Talking therapies for people with dementia are effective, though adaptations to address their unique support needs are essential. Several studies explored multicomponent interventions, making it difficult to ascertain which specific elements of psychological intervention were most effective. Additionally, individuals from ethnically diverse backgrounds were consistently underrepresented across the studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.