Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451961›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2026

A Review on Quantitative Process Analytical Technology for Continuous Downstream Processing of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Mariana Carvalho, Ana Cruz, Cees Haringa, Marcel Ottens, Marieke Klijn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariana CarvalhoDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ana CruzJohnson and Johnson Innovative Medicine, Manufacturing Sciences and Technology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cees HaringaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Marcel OttensDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Marieke KlijnDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

Chemistry NL and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The competition in the biopharmaceutical market is increasing due to the market entry of biosimilars and rising costs in research and development of new drugs. Hence, continuous manufacturing gained significant attention due to its potential in reducing production cycle times and costs, as well as the possibility of real-time release testing. As a consequence, active monitoring and/or control systems are required for quantitative product quality measurements and in-process control. Process analytical technology emerged as a robust strategy for the development and implementation of in situ real-time testing, instead of the standard batch testing of end product. Through the evaluation of state-of-the-art applications, this review highlights future opportunities in the field of quantitative real-time analytical techniques for the characterization of monoclonal antibodies in continuous downstream biomanufacturing.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiotechnologyHumansAntibodies, Monoclonalcontinuous downstream biomanufacturingmonoclonal antibodiesprocess analytical technology

Identifiers

PMID41451961
PMCPMC12883902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.