ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Lexicon for Clonal Hematopoiesis in Liquid Biopsy.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy for Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Endometrial and Cervical Cancers: Molecular Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical application of liquid biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: taking ctDNA for example-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Methylated circulating tumor DNA: technical challenges and clinical applications in non-small cell lung cancer patients-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer: Future Perspectives Through the Lens of Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review of Novel Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Lexicon for Clonal Hematopoiesis in Liquid Biopsy.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, clonal hematopoiesis (CH) has been recognized as a confounder of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing. Recent evidence now demonstrates the role of CH as a risk factor in health, generating distinct sources of cfDNA that can be leveraged for liquid biopsy diagnostics. Nonetheless, gaps in standardization challenge the advancement of such diagnostics from development to regulatory approval, through clinical trials, and ultimately, to routine implementation. In 2024, the Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer (BLOODPAC) Consortium, a collaborative infrastructure for developing standards and best practices for liquid biopsy assays, established the CH/clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) Working Group to address the need for accurate identification and removal of CH from liquid biopsy results. As a first step to support the interpretability of CH/CHIP results, the Working Group developed this lexicon to standardize terms and provide a unified vocabulary related to CH and liquid biopsy, DNA sequencing tests, biomarkers, and clinical use cases, facilitating communication within the field. BLOODPAC's CH/CHIP Working Group believes that terminology agreement across these various stakeholders can improve communication in the field and unify future data collection efforts across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.