ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Comprehensive safety assessment of donepezil: pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saccadic Oscillations After Donepezil Administration in Patients with Dementia: Time Course and Clinical Correlates.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Machine Learning and Molecular Modeling Strategy for the Identification of CNS-Active Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuroticism is linked to cognitive decline and increased risk of Alzheimer's disease through dysregulation of excitatory neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Safety signals of perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) has a growing global prevalence, and the need for safe and effective treatments is urgent. Donepezil is commonly used therapeutic agents for AD but has safety controversies. The objective of this study was to thoroughly evaluate donepezil's adverse event profile using actual data. Methods: In this study, reports of donepezil-related adverse events were collected from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2024 through the FAERS database. The association of donepezil-induced adverse events was disproportionality analyzed using Reporting odds Ratios (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), among other methods. Results: A total of 26,120 ADRs with donepezil as the "first suspect" were retrieved during the reporting period. The most common AEs included nausea, vomiting, syncope, and dizziness, which were consistent with the labeling of the medication and clinical trials. Unintended major AEs such as fall, hypotension, tremor, cognitive disorder, mania, and the highest signal of pleurothotonus were also detected. The reports also collected were characterized by a high proportion of female patients (51.3%) and the time of AE induction within 30 days (41%). Conclusion: Donepezil treatment needs to focus on cardiovascular and neurological adverse events, especially for women, elderly patients, or patients with co-morbidities, cardiac monitoring and dose adjustment should be strengthened. Clinics need to balance efficacy and risk, develop individualized dosing regimens, and explore novel therapeutic strategies to improve long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.