ArticleHealth care science2025
Research on Cancer Prediction Based on Feature Optimization and Multimodal Fusion.
Article in Health care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on Cancer Prediction Based on Feature Optimization and Multimodal Fusion.Health care science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current lung cancer initial diagnosis relies on experienced doctors combining imaging and biological indicators, but uneven medical resource distribution in China leads to delayed early diagnosis, affecting prognosis. Existing methods struggle with large-scale screening, multitracking, and over-reliance on single-modality data, ignoring the potential of multisource complementary information. Key technical challenges-effective data collection, multimodal feature extraction/fusion, and AI model construction-limit clinical application. Thus, exploring AI, new sensors, and existing data for efficient, fast, accurate, and radiation-free preliminary diagnosis is crucial for timely treatment and improved outcomes. Methods: This study collected hematological data, and used fiber-optic vibration sensors and audio sensors to capture heterogeneous signals of patients' lung respiration. Fiber-optic respiratory frequency, audio-respiratory rhythm, and hematological leukocyte-related features were extracted, optimized as multimodal inputs. The SCCA-LMF fusion method generated fusion samples, which were input into an improved stacking ensemble learning model (including SVM, XGBoost, etc.) for binary classification. Results: The experiment included 360 actual samples (lung cancer: nonlung cancer = 3.6:1) with complete data of 55-65-year-old males and females. Predictive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score reached 97.70%, 95.75%, 99.64%, and 99.64%, respectively, outperforming existing independent LMF and TFN methods. This model effectively integrates respiratory vibration, audio signals, and routine blood tests. A multimodal feature grading fusion strategy was designed for 3D data analysis to comprehensively understand patient health and enhance prediction capabilities. All data and results are reproducible. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the method's potential for lung cancer preliminary identification, bridging medicine and engineering to improve healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.