Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451377›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Flow cytometric detection of leukemic stem cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: current status and future directions.

Mariam M Youssef, Christopher Y Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mariam M YoussefPathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Christopher Y ParkPathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) plays a critical role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment response evaluation and prognosis. However, current AML MRD detection by flow cytometry (FC) is limited in sensitivity due to immunophenotypic variability, similarities to normal hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, and the lack of stable leukemia-associated immunophenotypes. A significant proportion of AML patients classified as MRD-negative by FC eventually relapse, likely due to the persistence of therapy-resistant leukemic stem cells (LSCs) that are not sensitively detected by routine clinical flow panels. Flow cytometry panels designed to detect LSC antigens, while promising, face challenges like immunophenotypic heterogeneity across AML subtypes, lack of standardized marker panels across laboratories, and limited validation. Here, we summarize the current state of FC-based LSC detection in AML, discussing commonly used markers, immunophenotypic variability, assay setup challenges, and we review recent clinical studies on LSC assessment, outlining their main findings and implications for prognosis and MRD integration. We also consider advances in spectral flow cytometry for improved LSC detection.

Indexed as

AML-acute myeloid leukemiaflow cytometryLSC-leukemic stem cellsMRD-measurable residual diseasetherapeutic targeting biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41451377
PMCPMC12727649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.