ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Real-world patient outcomes with Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab in adult relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective analysis from two Romanian oncology centers.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of adult relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) remains a significant challenge, with patients presenting particularly poor historical outcomes. Novel immunotherapies, such as Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab, have revived the therapeutic landscape of R/R B-ALL, but their optimal sequencing, toxicity management, and post-transplant integration remain unclear, particularly in real-world, resource-limited settings. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 33 adult patients with R/R B-ALL treated between 2019 and 2023 at two major oncology centers in Romania. Results: Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab achieved complete remission rates of 47.6% and 90%, respectively, with measurable residual disease negativity in over 60% of responders. Inotuzumab was more effective in early relapses and cases with high disease burden, while Blinatumomab showed benefit in later relapses and post-transplant settings. Eleven patients were successfully bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplant, and four were treated for post-transplant relapse, demonstrating the feasibility of immunotherapy in both contexts. Sequential monoclonal antibody use yielded poor survival unless used as a bridge to curative therapy. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the need for individualized treatment selection, rational immunotherapy sequencing, and the development of predictive biomarkers to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicity. Further studies are needed to refine therapeutic algorithms and define such prognostic biomarkers, particularly in underfunded healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.