ArticleIntegrative medicine research2026
Prospective registration of guidelines and consensus statements of traditional and integrative medicine: Current status and experience from the PREPARE platform.
Article in Integrative medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prospective registration of guidelines enhances transparency and reduces research waste. With the growing number of Traditional and Integrative Medicine (TIM) guidelines, the purpose of this study was to analyze the registrations of TIM guidelines and consensus statements on the Practice guideline REgistration for transPAREncy (PREPARE) platform. Methods: All TIM guidelines and consensus statements registered on PREPARE by December 31, 2024, were included. Data on registration year, type, category, country, evidence grading, funding, use of systematic reviews, and protocols were extracted and summarized as frequencies and percentages. Results: As of December 31, 2024, a total of 3434 projects had been registered on PREPARE, of which 587 (17.1%) pertained to traditional and integrative medicine. Among these, 380 (64.7%) were traditional medicine guidelines and consensus statements, and 207 (35.3%) involved integrative medicine. Of the TIM-related guidelines and consensus statements, 401 were standard guidelines and 150 were consensus statements; most (551/587, 93.9%) were registrations for original versions. Nearly half (268/587, 45.7%) addressed both diagnostic and treatment procedures. The majority of registrations (511/587, 87.1%) reported that systematic reviews would inform guidelines and consensus statements. Furthermore, 501 (85.3%) guidelines and consensus statements stated they would grade the strength of evidence and recommendations, with the grading methods specified. Approximately 80% (466/587) explicitly reported their sources of funding, amounting to 632 individual funding sources. Conclusion: Despite increased use of public platforms for registration, further efforts are needed to improve awareness and practice. The PREPARE working group will collaborate with TIM guideline developers to implement initiatives that advance the rigor, transparency, and usability of TIM guidelines and consensus statements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.