Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451336›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Neoplasia in the dromedary camel: a review (

Hassan Abu Damir, Mohamed H Tageldin, Mahmoud A Ali, Abdu Adem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hassan Abu DamirDepartment of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed H TageldinCollege of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Mahmoud A AliDepartment of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Abdu AdemDepartment of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dromedary camels are a source of milk, meat, wool, and income in poor societies and play an important role in social events. Tumors have devastating effects on the health, production, reproduction, and marketing value of dromedaries. Reviews on neoplasia in dromedaries are scarce, making it pertinent to present this comprehensive study. Aim: This review provides insights into the epidemiology, pathology, future diagnosis, and treatment of camel tumors. Methods: The literature on tumors in dromedaries is reviewed with a focus on tumor types in different body systems, epidemiology, risk factors, future diagnosis, and treatment. Epidemiological data were collected from various sources, analyzed, and presented according to body systems. The relative frequencies of malignant and benign tumors were displayed. Results: The relative frequencies of tumors in camels were as follows: skin (54.8%), reproductive (23.0%), lymphoid (6.9%), and gastrointestinal (6.3%). The common malignant and benign tumors were observed in the following order: carcinomas (35.5%), fibromas (11.2%), teratomas (7.8%), lymphomas and leukemia (7.4%), papillomas (6.2%), and adenomas (6.2%). A recent rise in tumor cases was observed. Possible risk factors included contamination of feed with fungal toxins and exposure to pesticides, herbicides, hydrocarbons, and heavy metals from the petroleum industry and gold mining. Other risk factors included environmental changes or famine, certain veterinary drugs and hormones, plant carcinogens, ultraviolet light, familial predisposition, and old age. The contraction of bovine papillomavirus (PV) during movement to new areas with denser animal populations is also likely. Conclusion: Different tumor types were reported in various body systems of the dromedary, with carcinomas, fibromas, teratomas, lymphomas/leukemia, and papillomas being the most common. An increase in tumor reports in camels is expected due to recent advancements in camel farming systems, specialized breeding centers, improvements in veterinary services, and enhanced disease surveillance. Some skin tumors, such as papillomas/fibropapillomas, exhibited koilocytosis, possibly caused by different PV strains, which may warrant further investigation. Abattoir tumor surveys may show bias, as dromedaries presented for slaughter were typically barren females or young males. Various diagnostic methods were discussed, and future advanced technologies for tumor diagnosis and treatment in camels, including targeted therapy and precision medicine, were suggested.

Indexed as

current and future tumor diagnosisdromedary camelsfuture tumor treatmentrisk factorstumor relative frequencytumors types and body location

Identifiers

PMID41451336
PMCPMC12731250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.