Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451202›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy rechallenge in second-line treatment after failure of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study.

Fei Li, Wenjing Gong, Miaomiao Yang, Aina Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fei Li *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Wenjing Gong *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Miaomiao Yang *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Aina Liu *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, ranking fifth in incidence and fourth in mortality. While immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined chemotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), most patients eventually experience disease progression. Currently, there is no unified consensus on second-line treatment strategies following failure of ICI combined chemotherapy. Immunotherapy rechallenge has shown potential efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, but its efficacy in AGC remains unclear. This retrospective study analyzed the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy rechallenge versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment for AGC patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 83 AGC patients who progressed after first-line treatment with ICI combined chemotherapy at Qingdao University Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital between December 2021 and March 2025. Among them, 49 patients received immunotherapy rechallenge and 34 patients received chemotherapy as second-line therapy. Efficacy was assessed according to the RECIST v1.1 criteria, including Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 3 or higher. Results: Immunotherapy rechallenge demonstrated superior outcomes compared with chemotherapy, with higher ORR (30.6% vs. 6.0%) and DCR (83.7% vs. 38.3%). Median PFS and median OS were 4.57 vs. 2.20 months and 12.4 vs. 5.33 months, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that second-line treatment modality, PD-L1 expression, and pathological type were independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas PFS was only influenced by treatment modality. In subgroup analysis, patients with CPS ≥1 derived significant benefit from immunotherapy rechallenge in both mPFS (4.83 vs. 2.20 months) and mOS (12.6 vs. 7.13 months, P<0.01), whereas no significant difference were observed in CPS<1 patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 26.5% of patients in the immunotherapy rechallenge group versus 35.3% in the chemotherapy group (p=0.049). Conclusion: For AGC patients who progressed after first-line ICI combined chemotherapy, immunotherapy rechallenge confers significant survival benefits compared to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy rechallenge is more effective in patients with high PD-L1 expression, suggesting its potential clinical application value as second-line treatment regimen.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsadvanced gastric cancer (AGC)chemotherapyimmunotherapy rechallengePD-L1 expressionsecond-line treatment

Identifiers

PMID41451202
PMCPMC12728067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.