ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Progress in the preparation of an active immunization model of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis in animals.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is the most common form of autoimmune encephalitis, and its primary immunologic mechanism is that NMDA antibodies bind to the NMDA receptor, causing NMDAR to internalize and weaken to trigger autoimmune encephalitis. Currently, NMDAR antibodies are detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with NMDAR encephalitis, which is associated with autoantibodies against neurosurface or synaptic antigens, and this antibody is an important marker for clinical diagnosis. However, both the complete pathogenesis and the pathophysiological mechanisms of anti-NMDAR encephalitis remain poorly understood. Animal models have been established as a fundamental research strategy to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this disease. Among these animal models, active immunity models have attracted significant attention due to its superior ability to recapitulate the disease onset and progression. Active immunity models of NMDAR encephalitis contain several classifications, each of which has its specific strengths and scope of applicability, depending on the research objectives. The primary objective of this review is to systematically classify existing active immunization models of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, with detailed discussion on their establishment protocols, respective advantages, current applications, and future prospects. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide valuable references and guidance for future basic research and clinical investigations on NMDAR encephalitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.