Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451186›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Safety in Numbers: A Scoping Review of Patient Census and Patient Outcomes.

Christine Wu, James C Etheridge, Manuel Castillo-Angeles, Paul A Bain, Stephanie L Nitzschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine WuFrom the Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
James C EtheridgeFrom the Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Manuel Castillo-AngelesDivision of Trauma, Burn, Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Paul A BainCountway Library of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Stephanie L NitzschkeFrom the Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Resident workload can significantly influence resident education, resident well-being, and patient care. Components of workload include duty hours and patient census, though their roles within the complexities of workload and subsequent effects remain underexplored. This scoping review aims to investigate how patient census impacts patient outcomes. Methods: Our scoping review searched multiple databases in April 2022 using a query framework that captured articles reporting the effect of inpatient service census on patient outcomes. English-language studies conducted in the United States were included. Three authors independently screened results, followed by full-text review. The data extracted contained study characteristics, characterization of census, patient outcomes, and intervention utilization. Results: Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of articles (92.3%) were published after 2003, the time of the initial Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty hour restrictions mandate. All studies were conducted in internal medicine programs. Most commonly studied outcomes were readmission, length of stay, mortality, quality and safety measures, and patient satisfaction. Five studies performed an intervention to optimize census, which included adding residents to the team and implementing census caps. The overall paucity and heterogeneity of the present literature led to variable findings on how census affects patient outcomes. Conclusions: There remains an incomplete understanding of the impact of patient census on patient outcomes and its role in workload, particularly among surgical specialties. Further efforts are needed to characterize the complexities of workload, compare differences in workload between surgical and nonsurgical specialties, and evaluate its impact on resident education, resident well-being, and patient care.

Indexed as

patient censuspatient outcomesresident workload

Identifiers

PMID41451186
PMCPMC12727286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.